Honor Win Turbo vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Win Turbo (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8500 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $359 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,268,740).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win Turbo
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Win Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 7000 mAh
- Lighter: 216g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $359 vs $950
- Better portability (44/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2268740
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 76/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Honor Win Turbo — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2268740 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $359 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win Turbo
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win Turbo and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Win Turbo by 46.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $591. Honor Win Turbo was $591 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (99/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win Turbo or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win Turbo or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.