Honor V Purse vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor V Purse (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 48/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 783,606); the Honor V Purse is noticeably lighter (214g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor V Purse
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor V Purse better?
- Lighter: 214g vs 309g
- Better portability (67/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 783606
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor V Purse vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 21 points higher (69/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor V Purse (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor V Purse are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (63/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor V Purse significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor V Purse | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 783606 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.7" Foldable OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2016x2348 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×135.6×4.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor V Purse
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor V Purse
- 7.7" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 2016x2348
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor V Purse
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor V Purse and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor V Purse by 73.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor V Purse
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor V Purse (90/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor V Purse are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (52/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (63/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor V Purse significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor V Purse or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor V Purse by 21 points (69/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Honor V Purse and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor V Purse has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor V Purse or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor V Purse or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Honor V Purse over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.