Honor V Purse vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor V Purse (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 48/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 783,606).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor V Purse
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Honor V Purse better?
- Overall rating 48/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 783606
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 35W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 201g vs 214g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 68/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor V Purse vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 26 points higher (74/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor V Purse (98/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (50/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 67/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor V Purse | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 783606 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.7" Foldable OLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2016x2348 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×135.6×4.3 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor V Purse
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor V Purse
- 7.7" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 2016x2348
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor V Purse
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Honor V Purse and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor V Purse by 80.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor V Purse (98/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (50/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor V Purse (52/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 67/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor V Purse or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor V Purse by 26 points (74/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Honor V Purse and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor V Purse has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor V Purse or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor V Purse or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Honor V Purse over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.