Honor Magic6 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 77/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5450); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,379,245); the Honor Magic6 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic6
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic6 better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2379245
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5450 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 73/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic6 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 14 points higher (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 (96/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic6 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic6 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2379245 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2800 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5450 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×75.4×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic6
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic6
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1264x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic6
- 5450 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic6 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic6 by 44.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic6
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 (96/100 vs 74/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic6 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Magic6 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic6 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic6 has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 74/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic6 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic6 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.