Honor Magic4 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic4 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,294,871); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 126); the Honor Magic4 Pro is noticeably lighter (209g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic4 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic4 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 100W vs 40W
- Lighter: 209g vs 230g
- Better portability (42/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 62/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic4 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic4 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (96/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic4 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1294871 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1312x2848 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 100W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 126 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×74.7×9.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic4 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic4 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1312x2848
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic4 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 100W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic4 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic4 Pro by 69.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic4 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (99/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic4 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (96/100 vs 62/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic4 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 62/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic4 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.