Honor Magic4 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic4 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 46/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 592,015); the Honor Magic4 Lite is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic4 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic4 Lite better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2101
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic4 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 45 points higher (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic4 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic4 Lite
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic4 Lite
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic4 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic4 Lite by 86.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic4 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (99/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (89/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite (85/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite by 45 points (91/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic4 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic4 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.