Honor Magic Vs2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic Vs2 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 62/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,420,808); the Honor Magic Vs2 is thinner (5.1mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic Vs2
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic Vs2 better?
- Lighter: 229g vs 230g
- Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic Vs2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 29 points higher (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic Vs2 (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic Vs2 (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic Vs2 (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic Vs2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic Vs2 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.9" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2156x2344 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 20 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×146.2×5.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic Vs2
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 20MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic Vs2
- 7.9" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2156x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic Vs2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic Vs2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic Vs2 by 66.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic Vs2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic Vs2 (99/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic Vs2 (96/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic Vs2 (85/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic Vs2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic Vs2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic Vs2 by 29 points (91/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic Vs2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic Vs2 has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic Vs2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic Vs2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic Vs2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic Vs2 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.