Honor Magic V2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic V2 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1249 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 45/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,738,135); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 117); the Honor Magic V2 is thinner (4.7mm vs 8.2mm).
Honor Magic V2
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Overall rating 45/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1738135
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 230g vs 231g
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1249
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 48/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (12/100 vs 11/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic V2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 42 points higher (87/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (77/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic V2 are nearly equal (12/100 vs 11/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (44/100 vs 24/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic V2 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1738135 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 11033 | |
| Display | 7.9" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2156x2344 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 117 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 20 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.7×145.4×4.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 231 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1249 | $950 |
Honor Magic V2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 20MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic V2
- 7.9" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2156x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic V2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic V2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic V2 by 59.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $299. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $299.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (96/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (96/100 vs 55/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (77/100 vs 48/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic V2 are nearly equal (12/100 vs 11/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V2 (44/100 vs 24/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic V2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V2 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.