Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 68/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,757,044).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design better?
- Overall rating 68/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 23 points higher (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design (85/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.9" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2156x2344 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 20 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 20MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design
- 7.9" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2156x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design by 58.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design (99/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design (96/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design (85/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design by 23 points (91/100 vs 68/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V2 RSR Porsche Design is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.