Honor Magic V vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic V (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 61/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4750); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,294,871); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 288g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic V better?
- Better portability (49/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4750 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 230g vs 288g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic V vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 30 points higher (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V (85/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V is a bit better (49/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic V | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1294871 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.9" Foldable OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1984x2272 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4750 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services (market/region dependent) | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.4×141.1×6.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 288 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 42MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic V
- 7.9" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1984x2272
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V
- 4750 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic V and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic V by 69.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic V
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V (99/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V (96/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V (85/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V is a bit better (49/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.