Honor Magic V Flip vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic V Flip (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 62/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,425,446); the Honor Magic V Flip is noticeably lighter (193g vs 230g).
Honor Magic V Flip
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 193g vs 230g
- Better portability (71/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1425446
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic V Flip vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 29 points higher (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V Flip (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V Flip (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V Flip (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V Flip significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (71/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic V Flip | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2520 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 167.3×75.6×7.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Honor Magic V Flip
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic V Flip
- 6.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2520
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic V Flip
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic V Flip and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic V Flip by 66.4% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Magic V Flip
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic V Flip (99/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V Flip (96/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V Flip (85/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V Flip significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (71/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic V Flip or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V Flip by 29 points (91/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V Flip and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V Flip has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V Flip or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V Flip or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V Flip over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic V Flip is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.