Honor Magic 7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Honor Magic 7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1099 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 82/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5270); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 3,018,146); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 148).

The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Honor Magic 7 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic 7 Pro
Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 76
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Honor Magic 7 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 223g vs 226g

  • Overall rating 82/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 3018146
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3057
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9302
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5270 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Cheaper: $899 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 79/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 76/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic 7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 5 points higher (87/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 79/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic 7 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (96/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic 7 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).

Honor Magic 7 Pro: The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic 7 Pro Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3018146 3269794
Geekbench Single 3057 3228
Geekbench Multi 9302 9553
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 80W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 148 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 223 g 226 g
Price $1099 $899
Camera comparison
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic 7 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3018146 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +7.7%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor Magic 7 Pro by 7.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Honor Magic 7 Pro
$1099
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $200. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $200.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic 7 Pro are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (96/100 vs 79/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic 7 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Honor Magic 7 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 79/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic 7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.