Honor Magic7 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor Magic7 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $599 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 84/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5650); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,967,184); the Honor Magic7 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Honor Magic7 better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $899
- Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2967184
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5650 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 4 points higher (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 81/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 — 82/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic7 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2967184 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5650 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.8×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1264x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7
- 5650 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor Magic7 by 10.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $300. Honor Magic7 was $300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic7 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Honor Magic7 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Magic7 has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.