Honor Magic 7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic 7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 72/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5270); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,018,146); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 148).
Honor Magic 7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 223g vs 230g
- Better design/ergonomics (21/100 vs 12/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3018146
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3057
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9302
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5270 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 79/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic 7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 15 points higher (87/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 79/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (96/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (96/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 77/100. In the "design" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (21/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic 7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3018146 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $950 |
Honor Magic 7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic 7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic 7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic 7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic 7 Pro by 28.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $149.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (96/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (96/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 77/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (21/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Magic 7 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic 7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 79/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic 7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.