Honor 90 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 90 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $500 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 70/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,463,370); the Honor 90 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 90 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 90 Pro better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $950
- Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1463370
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 90 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 21 points higher (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Honor 90 Pro — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 90 Pro (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 90 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 90 Pro (85/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 90 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 90 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1463370 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2700x1224 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×74.9×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 90 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 90 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2700x1224
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 90 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 90 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 90 Pro by 65.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $450. Honor 90 Pro was $450 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 90 Pro (99/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 90 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 90 Pro (85/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 90 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 90 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 90 Pro by 21 points (91/100 vs 70/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 90 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 90 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 90 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 90 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Honor 90 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 90 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.