Honor 70 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 70 Lite (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 34/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 477,542); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 58); the Honor 70 Lite is noticeably lighter (194g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 70 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 70 Lite better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 230g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1816
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 70 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 57 points higher (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 70 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 70 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" TFT LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 58 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.1×8.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 70 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 70 Lite
- 6.5" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 70 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 70 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 70 Lite by 88.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 70 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (99/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (89/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 70 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 70 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Lite by 57 points (91/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 70 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 70 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 70 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 70 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Honor 70 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.