Honor 600 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 600 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 79/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,120,347); the Honor 600 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (202g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 600 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 600 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 202g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2120347
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 600 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 12 points higher (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 600 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (86/100 vs 85/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 600 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2120347 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2728 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.1×74.8×7.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2728
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 600 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 600 Pro (China) by 50.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 600 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 600 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (86/100 vs 85/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 600 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 600 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.