Honor 600 (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 600 (China) (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600 (China) has the bigger battery (8600 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,329,936); the Honor 600 (China) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 600 (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 600 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 8600 vs 7000 mAh
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1329936
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1270
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4106
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 66/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 74/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 600 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 600 (China) (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 600 (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 600 (China) (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 74/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 600 (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1329936 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1270 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4106 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2728 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×74.7×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 600 (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 600 (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2728
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 600 (China)
- 8600 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 600 (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 600 (China) by 68.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 600 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 600 (China) (99/100 vs 66/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 600 (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 600 (China) (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 74/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 600 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 600 (China) by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 600 (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 600 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 600 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 66/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 600 (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.