Honor 400 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 400 (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $449 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5300); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,087,371); the Honor 400 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 230g).
Honor 400
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 184g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $950
- Better portability (76/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1087371
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2967
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5300 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Honor 400 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Honor 400 — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 (85/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor 400 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1087371 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2967 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | $950 |
Honor 400
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 400
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 400
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 400 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 400 by 74.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $501. Honor 400 was $501 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (99/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 (85/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 400 has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.