Honor 400 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 400 (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $449 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5300); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,087,525); the Honor 400 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 400 better?
- Lighter: 184g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $950
- Better portability (76/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1087525
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3111
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5300 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Honor 400 — 50/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 (85/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1087525 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 400
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 400 by 74.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $501. Honor 400 was $501 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (99/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 (85/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 400 has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.