Honor 400 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 400 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $460 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 80/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,158,558); the Honor 400 Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 230g).
Honor 400 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $460 vs $950
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2158558
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 7192
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Honor 400 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 11 points higher (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). Value score: Honor 400 Pro — 90/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor 400 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2158558 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2205 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7192 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.8×76.1×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $460 | $950 |
Honor 400 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 400 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 400 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:11 hrs, total 24:36 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 400 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 400 Pro by 49.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $490. Honor 400 Pro was $490 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 400 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor 400 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 400 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 400 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 400 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.