Honor 400 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor 400 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $460 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 80/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,243,804); the Honor 400 Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Honor 400 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $460 vs $899
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2243804
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 8 points higher (88/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 78/100). Value score: Honor 400 Pro — 84/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2243804 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.8×76.1×8.1 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $460 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:11 hrs, total 24:36 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 400 Pro by 32.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $439. Honor 400 Pro was $439 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Honor 400 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 400 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 400 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.