Honor 400 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 400 Lite (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $249 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 54/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5230); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 668,462); the Honor 400 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 400 Lite better?
- Lighter: 171g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $950
- Better portability (84/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2321
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5230 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 37 points higher (91/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Honor 400 Lite — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (99/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5230 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 171 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Lite
- 5230 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 400 Lite by 84.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $701. Honor 400 Lite was $701 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (99/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite by 37 points (91/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 400 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.