Honor 300 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor 300 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $580 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 76/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,237,843); the Honor 300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (198g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 300 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Honor 300 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 198g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $580 vs $899
- Better portability (58/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2237843
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 66/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 300 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 12 points higher (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Honor 300 Ultra — 68/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 300 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 300 Ultra (96/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 300 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 300 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2237843 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×75.3×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $580 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 300 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 300 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 300 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 300 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 300 Ultra by 32.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $319. Honor 300 Ultra was $319 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 300 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 300 Ultra (96/100 vs 66/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 300 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor 300 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 300 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 66/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor 300 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.