Honor 200 Smart vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 200 Smart (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 40/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 568,395); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 55); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor 200 Smart doesn't; the Honor 200 Smart is noticeably lighter (191g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Smart
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 Smart better?
- Lighter: 191g vs 230g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 568395
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2115
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 7/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Smart vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 51 points higher (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (96/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Smart notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Smart | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 568395 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2115 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 55 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Smart
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Smart
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Smart
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Smart and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 200 Smart by 86.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 200 Smart
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (99/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (89/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (96/100 vs 7/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Smart notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart by 51 points (91/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Smart and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Smart has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 7/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Smart over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.