Honor 200 Smart vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 200 Smart (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 41/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 560,863); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 55); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor 200 Smart doesn't; the Honor 200 Smart is noticeably lighter (191g vs 230g).
Honor 200 Smart
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 191g vs 230g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 560863
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2249
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 7/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 65/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Smart vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 50 points higher (91/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (96/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Smart notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Smart | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 560863 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 923 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2249 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 55 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Honor 200 Smart
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 200 Smart
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 200 Smart
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 200 Smart and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 200 Smart by 86.8% in our overall performance rating.
Honor 200 Smart
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (99/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (89/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (96/100 vs 7/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Smart notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart by 50 points (91/100 vs 41/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Smart and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Smart has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 7/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Smart over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Smart is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.