Honor 200 Pro vs Poco F8 Ultra
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $700 and $729. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,651,476 vs 1,698,060); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Poco F8 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 50W
- Lighter: 199g vs 218g
- Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $729
- Better portability (57/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3651476 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (90/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Poco F8 Ultra, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 70/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Poco F8 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (97/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Poco F8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 3651476 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | $729 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Poco F8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F8 Ultra leads Honor 200 Pro by 53.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $29. Honor 200 Pro was $29 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (97/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Poco F8 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Poco F8 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Poco F8 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 70/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.