Honor Robot Phone vs Poco F8 Ultra
The Honor Robot Phone (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Robot Phone leads — 91/100 vs 89/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Honor Robot Phone is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,640,351).
Honor Robot Phone
Poco F8 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3640351
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 97/100)
- Better camera (100/100 vs 90/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 72/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Honor Robot Phone vs the Poco F8 Ultra, the Honor Robot Phone scores 2 points higher (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Robot Phone leads (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Robot Phone and the Poco F8 Ultra are nearly equal (98/100 vs 97/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Robot Phone is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 72/100).
| Specification | Honor Robot Phone | Poco F8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3640351 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 218 g | |
| Price | — | $670 |
Honor Robot Phone
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Robot Phone
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Robot Phone
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Honor Robot Phone and Poco F8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Robot Phone leads Poco F8 Ultra by 8.3% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Robot Phone
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Robot Phone and the Poco F8 Ultra are nearly equal (98/100 vs 97/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Robot Phone is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 72/100).
Which is better: the Honor Robot Phone or the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Honor Robot Phone edges out the Poco F8 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Robot Phone and the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Honor Robot Phone has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Poco F8 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Robot Phone or the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Honor Robot Phone leads on camera score (100/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Honor Robot Phone over the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Honor Robot Phone is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.