Honor 200 Pro vs Poco F7 Ultra
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $700 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 74/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 5200); the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,932,885 vs 1,698,060).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Poco F7 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 50W
- Lighter: 199g vs 212g
- Better portability (57/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2932885 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $700
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (71/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 8 points higher (82/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 75/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (71/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Poco F7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 2932885 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5300 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | $500 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Ultra leads Honor 200 Pro by 42.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Poco F7 Ultra was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (71/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra edges out the Honor 200 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 82/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.