Honor 200 Pro vs Poco F9 Ultra
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Poco F9 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Ultra leads — 90/100 vs 74/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Ultra has the bigger battery (8050 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,165,108 vs 1,698,060); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 238g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Poco F9 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 50W
- Lighter: 199g vs 238g
- Better portability (57/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Poco F9 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4165108 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 8050 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (90/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Poco F9 Ultra, the Poco F9 Ultra scores 16 points higher (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F9 Ultra (57/100 vs 31/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Poco F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 4165108 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 8050 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 163.5×78.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 238 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F9 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F9 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Poco F9 Ultra
- 8050 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Poco F9 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Ultra leads Honor 200 Pro by 59.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco F9 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (98/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F9 Ultra (57/100 vs 31/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Poco F9 Ultra — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 70/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Poco F9 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.