Honor X7c vs Vivo Y300
The Honor X7c (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo Y300 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 leads — 51/100 vs 46/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X7c has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Honor X7c has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X7c
Vivo Y300
What makes Honor X7c better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 46/100
What makes Vivo Y300 better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 35W
- Lighter: 188g vs 193g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 65/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X7c vs the Vivo Y300, the Vivo Y300 scores 5 points higher (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X7c | Vivo Y300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 568395 | 568395 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2115 | 2115 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 163.2×75.9×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor X7c
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y300
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor X7c
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X7c
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X7c and Vivo Y300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X7c or the Vivo Y300?
The Vivo Y300 edges out the Honor X7c by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X7c and the Vivo Y300?
The Honor X7c has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo Y300 — 51/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X7c or the Vivo Y300?
The Vivo Y300 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Honor X7c over the Vivo Y300?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo Y300 (79/100 vs 65/100).