Honor Play9A vs Vivo Y32t
The Honor Play9A (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 27/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play9A has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 193,858); the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 194g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play9A
Vivo Y32t
What makes Honor Play9A better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 781 vs 779
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 193858
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 189
- Lighter: 179g vs 194g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 11/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play9A vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 1 points higher (28/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Play9A leads (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor Play9A notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play9A | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G36 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 193858 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 189 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 781 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.6" | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×75.8×8.7 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play9A
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Play9A
- 6.6"
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Honor Play9A
- 5200 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play9A and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Honor Play9A by 36.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Play9A notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (74/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play9A or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Honor Play9A by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play9A and the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor Play9A has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Play9A or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play9A over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Honor Play9A (74/100 vs 52/100).