Honor X7c vs Vivo Y200 (Asia)
The Honor X7c (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo Y200 (Asia) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads — 52/100 vs 46/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X7c has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Honor X7c has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) doesn't.
Honor X7c
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 46/100
- Faster charging: 80W vs 35W
- Lighter: 188g vs 193g
- Better camera (40/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 65/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 61/100)
Comparing the Honor X7c vs the Vivo Y200 (Asia), the Vivo Y200 (Asia) scores 6 points higher (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
| Specification | Honor X7c | Vivo Y200 (Asia) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 560863 | 560863 | |
| Geekbench Single | 923 | 923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2249 | 2249 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 163.2×75.9×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Honor X7c
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X7c
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X7c
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor X7c and Vivo Y200 (Asia), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
Which is better: the Honor X7c or the Vivo Y200 (Asia)?
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) edges out the Honor X7c by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X7c and the Vivo Y200 (Asia)?
The Honor X7c has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X7c or the Vivo Y200 (Asia)?
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads on camera score (40/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Honor X7c over the Vivo Y200 (Asia)?
The Honor X7c is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a better fit for everyday use.