Nokia G400 vs Redmi Note 9S
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Redmi Note 9S (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 39/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 9S has the bigger battery (5020 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Note 9S is faster in AnTuTu (514,398 vs 477,542); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 9S doesn't.
Nokia G400
Redmi Note 9S
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1762
- Faster charging: 20W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 198g vs 210g
- Better display (66/100 vs 42/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 44/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 514398 vs 477542
- Bigger battery: 5020 vs 5000 mAh
- Better camera (34/100 vs 33/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Redmi Note 9S, the Nokia G400 scores 4 points higher (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100. In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (66/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 9S and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Redmi Note 9S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 514398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1762 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 450 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 165.8×76.7×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Note 9S
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 9S
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 9S
- 5020 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Redmi Note 9S, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Note 9S leads Nokia G400 by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (66/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 9S and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Redmi Note 9S?
The Nokia G400 edges out the Redmi Note 9S by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Redmi Note 9S?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Redmi Note 9S — 39/100.
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Redmi Note 9S?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use.