Honor 200 Lite vs Vivo Y32t
The Honor 200 Lite (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 Lite leads — 27/100 vs 11/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor 200 Lite has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Honor 200 Lite is thinner (6.8mm vs 8.3mm).
Honor 200 Lite
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 166g vs 179g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (92/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Lite vs the Vivo Y32t, the Honor 200 Lite scores 16 points higher (27/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite leads (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (36/100 vs 27/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Lite | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 86 | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.6×6.8 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $206 | — |
Honor 200 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor 200 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 200 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (31/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (36/100 vs 27/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 Lite is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Lite and the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 Lite leads on camera score (31/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Lite over the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 Lite is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.