Honor 200 Lite vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Honor 200 Lite (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 Lite leads — 27/100 vs 26/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor 200 Lite has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 doesn't; the Honor 200 Lite is thinner (6.8mm vs 7.8mm).
Honor 200 Lite
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 166g vs 173g
- Better design/ergonomics (92/100 vs 83/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 35W
- Better camera (37/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (30/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Lite vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Honor 200 Lite scores 1 points higher (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Honor 200 Lite are nearly equal (30/100 vs 27/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Lite is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Lite | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 44W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 86 | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.6×6.8 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 173 g | |
| Price | $206 | — |
Honor 200 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor 200 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor 200 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Honor 200 Lite are nearly equal (30/100 vs 27/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Lite is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Honor 200 Lite edges out the Vivo iQOO Z7 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Lite and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Honor 200 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Lite over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Honor 200 Lite is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use.