Samsung Galaxy A07 4G vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G leads — 26/100 vs 11/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP.
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 184g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 70/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G scores 15 points higher (26/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A07 4G | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 408000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 760 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1890 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $103 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.