Honor Play9C vs Vivo Y32t
The Honor Play9C (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Play9C leads — 35/100 vs 28/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play9C has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Honor Play9C is faster in AnTuTu (513,809 vs 303,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play9C
Vivo Y32t
What makes Honor Play9C better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 513809 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 688 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1900 vs 779
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 20/100)
- Better display (44/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 190g
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play9C vs the Vivo Y32t, the Honor Play9C scores 7 points higher (35/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Play9C leads (41/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Play9C notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (41/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Play9C is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Honor Play9C are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play9C | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 513809 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 688 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1900 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.6" TFT LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 780 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×75.3×8.4 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play9C
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Play9C
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Honor Play9C
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play9C and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Play9C leads Vivo Y32t by 69.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Play9C notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (41/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Play9C is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Honor Play9C are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play9C or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor Play9C edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play9C and the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor Play9C has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Play9C or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor Play9C leads on performance (41/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play9C over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Honor Play9C (41/100 vs 20/100).