Google Pixel XL vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel XL (2016) runs on the Snapdragon 821, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $769 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 26/100 (a 65-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3450); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 312,361); the Google Pixel XL is noticeably lighter (168g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL by 65 points (91/100 vs 26/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel XL
Performance 22
Display 66
Camera 10
Battery 12
Portability 73
Value for money 0
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Google Pixel XL better?
  • Lighter: 168g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $769 vs $950

  • Better portability (73/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 312361
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 390
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 792
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3450 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel XL vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 65 points higher (91/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Google Pixel XL — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL (99/100 vs 22/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel XL (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL (85/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel XL significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel XL: The Google Pixel XL is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel XL Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Snapdragon 821 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 312361 4247433
Geekbench Single 390 3640
Geekbench Multi 792 11033
Display 5.5" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1440x2560 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3450 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 7.1 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 154.7×75.7×8.5 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 168 g 230 g
Launch price $769 $950
Camera comparison
Google Pixel XL
  • Main: 12MP f/f/2.0
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel XL
  • 5.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x2560
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
66
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel XL
  • 3450 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel XL and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel XL Snapdragon 821
26/100
312361 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +92.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel XL by 92.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel XL
$769
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $181. Google Pixel XL was $181 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL (99/100 vs 22/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel XL (89/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL (85/100 vs 12/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel XL significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel XL by 65 points (91/100 vs 26/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel XL and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel XL has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 22/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel XL over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel XL is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.