Google Pixel Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Google Pixel Fold (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4821); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,186,373); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 133); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 283g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel Fold
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Google Pixel Fold better?
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1186373
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1461
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3867
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4821 mAh
- Lighter: 230g vs 283g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel Fold vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Google Pixel Fold are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (85/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel Fold | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1186373 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1461 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3867 | 11047 | |
| Display | Foldable OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1840x2208 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4821 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 133 | 170 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1550 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.7×139.7×5.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 283 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel Fold
- Main: —
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel Fold
- Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1840x2208
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel Fold
- 4821 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel Fold and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel Fold by 72.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (99/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Google Pixel Fold are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (96/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (85/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel Fold has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 65/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel Fold over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.