Google Pixel Fold vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel Fold (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 65/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4821); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 859,865); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 133); the Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably lighter (226g vs 283g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold by 22 points (87/100 vs 65/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel Fold
Performance 60
Display 85
Camera 67
Battery 60
Portability 52
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Google Pixel Fold better?

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 859865
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1459
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3451
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4821 mAh
  • Lighter: 226g vs 283g

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel Fold vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 22 points higher (87/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

Google Pixel Fold: The Google Pixel Fold is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel Fold Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G2 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 859865 3258010
Geekbench Single 1459 3228
Geekbench Multi 3451 9553
Display Foldable OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1840x2208 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4821 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 133 171
Main camera 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1550 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 158.7×139.7×5.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 283 g 226 g
Launch price $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel Fold
  • Main: —
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Front: 8MP
67
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel Fold
  • Foldable OLED
  • Resolution: 1840x2208
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel Fold
  • 4821 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
60
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel Fold and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2
65/100
859865 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +73.6%
3258010 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel Fold by 73.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel Fold
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (93/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (96/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (81/100 vs 60/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold by 22 points (87/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel Fold has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel Fold over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.