Google Pixel Fold vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Google Pixel Fold (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 67/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4821); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,186,373); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 133); the Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably lighter (226g vs 283g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel Fold
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Google Pixel Fold better?
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1186373
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1461
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3867
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4821 mAh
- Lighter: 226g vs 283g
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel Fold vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 21 points higher (88/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (94/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel Fold | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G2 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1186373 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1461 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3867 | 10243 | |
| Display | Foldable OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1840x2208 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4821 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 133 | 171 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1550 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.7×139.7×5.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 283 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel Fold
- Main: —
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel Fold
- Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1840x2208
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel Fold
- 4821 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel Fold and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel Fold by 64.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (94/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Google Pixel Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (96/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (81/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold by 21 points (88/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Google Pixel Fold has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 65/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel Fold over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Google Pixel Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.