Google Pixel 9a vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel 9a (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 66/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,321,069); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 128); the Google Pixel 9a is noticeably lighter (186g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a by 25 points (91/100 vs 66/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9a
Performance 71
Display 82
Camera 63
Battery 52
Portability 58
Value for money 58
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Google Pixel 9a better?
  • Lighter: 186g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $950

  • Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1321069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1977
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4778
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 23W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9a vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 25 points higher (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9a — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9a notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel 9a: The Google Pixel 9a is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9a Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1321069 4247433
Geekbench Single 1977 3640
Geekbench Multi 4778 11033
Display 6.3" P-OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2424x1080 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5100 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 23W 100W
Wireless charging 7W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 128 170
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 154.7×73.3×8.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 186 g 230 g
Launch price $499 $950
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9a
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
63
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9a
  • 6.3" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 2424x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9a
  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 23W
  • Wireless: 7W
52
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9a and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4
66/100
1321069 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +68.9%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9a by 68.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 9a
$499
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $451. Google Pixel 9a was $451 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (99/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (96/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (85/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9a notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a by 25 points (91/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9a and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9a has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9a over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9a is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.