Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $1099 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 74/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5060); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 1,672,795); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 221g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?
- Better display (86/100 vs 84/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 1672795
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 1900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 5200
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5060 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 37W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 23W
- Lighter: 205g vs 221g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $1099
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 88/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 57/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 13 points higher (87/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (83/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (59/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 1672795 | 3032039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1900 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5200 | 8932 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5060 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 37W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 23W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 160 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 221 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $661 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 5060 mAh
- Wired: 37W
- Wireless: 23W
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 44.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $438. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $438 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (83/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (59/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 88/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.