Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL (2026) runs on the Tensor G6, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 79/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5115); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 1,933,536); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
What makes Google Pixel 11 Pro XL better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2755 vs 2725
- Better display (86/100 vs 84/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 1933536
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 7563
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5115 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
- Lighter: 205g vs 226g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 83/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 61/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 33/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 8 points higher (87/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL (83/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL (59/100 vs 33/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro XL | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Tensor G6 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 1933536 | 3032039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2755 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7563 | 8932 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5115 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 168 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | — | $661 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 13MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
- 5115 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 25W
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Google Pixel 11 Pro XL by 36.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL (83/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL (59/100 vs 33/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL over the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.