Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (2026) runs on the Tensor G6, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 63/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4806); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 1,951,408); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 239g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
What makes Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2755 vs 2725
- Overall rating 63/100
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 1951408
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 7563
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4806 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 205g vs 239g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 24 points higher (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Tensor G6 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 1951408 | 3032039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2755 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7563 | 8932 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4806 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.0 mm | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 239 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | — | $661 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- 4806 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold by 35.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold by 24 points (87/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold over the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.