Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 64/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,401,321); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 129); the Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably lighter (229g vs 257g).
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Better portability (52/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 4516
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W
- Lighter: 229g vs 257g
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1799
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 22 points higher (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 32/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1750 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4516 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $889 |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 54.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $910. Vivo X200 Ultra was $910 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (92/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (93/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (78/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 22 points (86/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.