Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Google Pixel 9 Pro (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $999 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 72/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,606,238); the Google Pixel 9 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1606238
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 5100
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 37W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 23W
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $999
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 73/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 80/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 88/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 14 points higher (86/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro — 54/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (92/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Google Pixel 9 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1606238 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1880 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5100 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2856x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 37W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 23W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
- 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2856x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 37W
- Wireless: 23W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro by 48.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $110. Vivo X200 Ultra was $110 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (92/100 vs 73/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Google Pixel 9 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 80/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (78/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 80/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 73/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.