Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 61/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,553,009); the Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably lighter (229g vs 258g).
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Better portability (52/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1553009
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2276
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 6173
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5015 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 229g vs 258g
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1799
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 25 points higher (86/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — 26/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (92/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1553009 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2276 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6173 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2152x2076 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5015 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 258 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $889 |
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2152x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 5015 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 49.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $910. Vivo X200 Ultra was $910 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (92/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (93/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (78/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 25 points (86/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.