Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Vivo X300s

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1799 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 64/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,401,321); the Vivo X300s is noticeably lighter (217g vs 257g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 36

Vivo X300s

Performance 95
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?


  • Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo X300s better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1401321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1707
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4431
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W
  • Lighter: 217g vs 257g
  • Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 25 points higher (89/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Vivo X300s
Processor Google Tensor G4 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1401321 3703823
Geekbench Single 1707 3293
Geekbench Multi 4431 10243
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 21W 90W
Wireless charging 7W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 129 —
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IPX8 —
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm —
Weight 257 g 217 g
Launch price $1799 $723

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera

Vivo X300s

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo X300s

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery

Vivo X300s

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +62.2%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 62.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

$1799

Vivo X300s

$723

Launch price difference: $1076. Vivo X300s was $1076 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (83/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Vivo X300s?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Vivo X300s?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.