Google Pixel 7 vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Google Pixel 7 (2022) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $599 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 62/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4355); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,192,791); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 140); the Google Pixel 7 is noticeably lighter (197g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7 by 24 points (86/100 vs 62/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 7
Performance 64
Display 69
Camera 73
Battery 41
Portability 53
Value for money 36
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 71
Portability 52
Value for money 76
What makes Google Pixel 7 better?
  • Lighter: 197g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1799

  • Better portability (53/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1192791
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1459
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3451
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4355 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 20W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (71/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 7 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 24 points higher (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 41/100). Value score: Google Pixel 7 — 36/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7 (98/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 7 (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7 (71/100 vs 41/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 7 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).

Google Pixel 7: The Google Pixel 7 is a better fit for active users.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 7 Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Google Tensor G2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1192791 3942923
Geekbench Single 1459 3640
Geekbench Multi 3451 11033
Display 6.3" OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4355 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 30W 80W
Wireless charging 20W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 140 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 13 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX9
Dimensions 155.6×73.2×8.7 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 197 g 285 g
Launch price $599 $1799
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 7
  • Main: 50MP f/1.85
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
73
camera
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 7
  • 6.3" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
69
display
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 7
  • 4355 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 20W
41
battery
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
71
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 7 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2
62/100
1192791 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100 +69.7%
3942923 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Google Pixel 7 by 69.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 7
$599
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799

Launch price difference: $1200. Google Pixel 7 was $1200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7 (98/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 7 (91/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7 (71/100 vs 41/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 7 and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 7 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7 by 24 points (86/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 7 and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 7 has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 7 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 7 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 7 over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 7 is a better fit for active users. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.