Google Pixel 10 Pro vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Google Pixel 10 Pro (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $999 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 73/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4870); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,536,042); the Google Pixel 10 Pro is noticeably lighter (207g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 10 Pro

Performance 76
Display 88
Camera 80
Battery 50
Portability 49
Value for money 56

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 207g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1799

  • Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1536042
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2285
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6191
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4870 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 29W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 80/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 49/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 10 points higher (83/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro — 56/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro (68/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Google Pixel 10 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro: The Google Pixel 10 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Google Tensor G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 1536042 3057215
Geekbench Single 2285 2833
Geekbench Multi 6191 9119
Display 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2856x1280 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4870 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 29W 68W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 10 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3300 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX9
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 207 g 285 g
Launch price $999 $1799

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
80
camera

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro

  • 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2856x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 10 Pro

  • 4870 mAh
  • Wired: 29W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5
73/100
1536042 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100 +49.8%
3057215 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Google Pixel 10 Pro by 49.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 10 Pro

$999

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Launch price difference: $800. Google Pixel 10 Pro was $800 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro (68/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Google Pixel 10 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 80/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.