Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 53/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has the bigger battery (5060 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,585,585); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 160); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably lighter (221g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 24 points (77/100 vs 53/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Performance 26
Display 100
Camera 88
Battery 46
Design 23
Value for money 34
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?
  • Bigger battery: 5060 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster wireless charging: 23W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 221g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $1099 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (23/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (34/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1585585
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5200
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 37W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 26/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 88/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 24 points higher (77/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (92/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (34/100 vs 0/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1585585 3942923
Geekbench Single 1900 3640
Geekbench Multi 5200 11033
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 37W 68W
Wireless charging 23W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 160 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 10 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX9
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 221 g 285 g
Price $1099 $1799
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
46
battery
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
53/100
1585585 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100 +59.8%
3942923 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 59.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
$1099
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799

Price difference: $700. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is cheaper by $700.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (92/100 vs 26/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (23/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (34/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 24 points (77/100 vs 53/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 26/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.