Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 74/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has the bigger battery (5060 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,672,795); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 160); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably lighter (221g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Performance 74
Display 86
Camera 88
Battery 57
Portability 41
Value for money 58

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?

  • Bigger battery: 5060 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 221g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1799

  • Better display (86/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1672795
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 5200
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 37W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 23W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 74/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 88/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 9 points higher (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (86/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 1672795 3057215
Geekbench Single 1900 2833
Geekbench Multi 5200 9119
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 37W 68W
Wireless charging 23W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 160 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 10 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX9
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 221 g 285 g
Launch price $1099 $1799

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
57
battery

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
74/100
1672795 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100 +45.3%
3057215 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 45.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

$1099

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Launch price difference: $700. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL was $700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (90/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (86/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.